Call for papers: On the impact of nanoscale science and technology on disability,

I'm in a big hurry today, so just time to cross post this request from Gregor Wolbring. If I'd had the opportunity, I would've edited some of the garbled coding in his text, but even without this improvement, the references are still clear and hence usable. Moreover, the issues raised are extremely important, so definitely worth drilling down through the layers to get to the good stuff.

For a special issue of the International Journal on Disability, Community & Rehabilitation (IJDCR) (http://www.ijdcr.ca/copyright.shtml)

Guest Editor: Gregor Wolbring, Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies Program, Dept of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary. <gwolbrin@ucalgary.ca>

Invitation
Nanoscale science and technology, while still in its infancy, describes a rapidly growing sphere of enquiry, with many and varied implications for the disability field. To establish a ‘benchmark’ of the current state of knowledge and conceptual understanding, the Editors of IJDCR decided a special issue should be devoted to the topic. Background information and potential topics are presented below.

We invite potential contributors, regardless of fields of study (discipline), to submit 250-word Abstracts that articulate the conceptual arguments and knowledge base to be covered in a critical analysis on some aspect of the impact of nanoscale science and technology on disability, community and/or rehabilitation. Please submit abstracts to the Guest Editor via e-mail by 30 October, 2008.

From selected abstracts, we will request full articles of 3000-5000 words (excluding figures and tables) of original research and scholarship on a range of topics. Note that an invitation to submit an article does not guarantee its publication. Every submitted article will be subject to blind peer review and recommendations arising.

Background
Nanotechnology in all its meanings allows for, among other things, the manipulation of materials on an atomic or molecular scale and enables a new paradigm of science and technology that sees different technologies converging at the nanoscale namely:
nanoscience and nanotechnology,
biotechnology and biomedicine, including genetic engineering,
information technology, including advanced computing and communications,
cognitive science (neuro-engineering),
synthetic biology;
hence, the designation "NBICS" (nano-bio-info-cogno-synbio).

Many lists of anticipated nanoproducts exist ADDIN REFMGR.CITE Institute of Nanotechnology20052326Research Applications And Markets In Nanotechnology In Europe 2005Report2326Research Applications And Markets In Nanotechnology In Europe 2005Institute of Nanotechnology2005ResearchNanotechnologyEurope reprint>Not in Filehttp://www.researchandmarkets.com/reportinfo.asp?report_id=302091&t=t&cat_id=424Kostoff20062330The seminal literature of nanotechnology researchJournal2330The seminal literature of nanotechnology researchKostoff,RonaldMurday,JamesLau,CliffordTolles,William2006/5LiteratureNanotechnologyResearchNot in File121Journal of Nanoparticle Research <>name=" target=_blank ISSN_ISBN>http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/Report/NBIC_report.pdf33;(M.Roco 2003). Many believe that advances in NBICS hold the key for extreme life extension to the level of immortality and the achievement of morphological ADDIN REFMGR.CITE Anders Sandberg2001159 Morphological Freedom -- Why We not just Want it, but Need itGeneric159 Morphological Freedom -- Why We not just Want it, but Need itAnders Sandberg2001Not in Filehttp://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/Texts/MorphologicalFreedom.htm33; (Anders Sandberg 2001) and genomic freedom ADDIN REFMGR.CITE Wolbring20031877SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE TRIPLE D (DISEASE, DISABILITY, DEFECT)Book Chapter1877SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE TRIPLE D (DISEASE, DISABILITY, DEFECT)Wolbring,G2003ScienceTechnologyDiseaseDISABILITIESNanotechnologyBiotechnology Cognitive ScienceNot in File232243Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive ScienceMihail C.Roco National,William Sims BainbridgeDordrechtKluwer Academic1-4020-1254-3http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/http://www.bioethicsanddisability.org/nbic.html3;(Wolbring 2003). NBICS-medicine is envisioned by some to have the answer to global problems of disease and ill medical and social health. Others argue for the pursuit of ‘morphological freedom’ ADDIN REFMGR.CITE Anders Sandberg2001159 Morphological Freedom -- Why We not just Want it, but Need itGeneric159 Morphological Freedom -- Why We not just Want it, but Need itAnders Sandberg2001Not in File
http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/Texts/MorphologicalFreedom.htm33> t;(Anders Sandberg 2001)--allowing the human body to move beyond typical functioning of the species. Disabled people are often highlighted as the beneficiaries of NBICS-medicine products. NBICS applications and the selling of NBICS health products focuses mostly on offering disabled people medical solutions (prevention or cure/normative adaptation) and might move towards transhumanist solutions (augmentation, enhancement of the human body) but rarely offers social solutions (adaptation of the environment, acceptance, societal cures of equal rights and respect). Many NBICS applications/products for disabled people are envisioned and are under development ADDIN REFMGR.CITE Wolbring20051706HTA Initiative #23 The triangle of enhancement medicine, disabled people, and the concept of health: a new challenge for HTA, health research, and health policyReport1706HTA Initiative #23 The triangle of enhancement medicine, disabled people, and the concept of health: a new challenge for HTA, health research, and health policyWolbring,G2005MedicineHealthResearchNot in FileAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Health Technology Assessment Unit, Edmonton, Alberta CanadaISBN 1-894927-36-2 (Print); ISBN 1-894927-37-0 (On-Line); ISSN: 1706-7855 http://www.ihe.ca/documents/hta/HTA-FR23.pdf24;(Wolbring 2005).

We chose this topic for an issue of IJDCR because of how the discourses around these new and emerging nanoscale science and technologies are emerging and their potential impact on people with disabilities, the communities linked to them and/or practitioners as well as others. Consumers and researchers linked to the disability discourse are involved will shape the positive or negative consequences for everyone involved.

Nanotechnology and NBICS have an impact on disabled people in at least four main ways.

Impact of NBICS on disabled people ADDIN REFMGR.CITE Wolbring20062426Scoping paper on Nanotechnology and disabled peopleElectronic Citation2426Scoping paper on Nanotechnology and disabled peopleWolbring,G2006NanotechnologyNot in FileCenter for Nanotechnology in Society Arizona Stat e University http://cns.asu.edu/cns-library/documents/wolbring-scoping%20CD%20final%20edit.doc <> name="System">Center for Nanotechnology in Society Arizona State University34(Wolbring 2006)
NBICS may develop tools to adapt the environment in which disabled people live and to give disabled people tools that would allow them to deal with environmental challenges. This side of S&T would make the life of disabled people more liveable without changing the identity and biological reality of the disabled person
NBICS may develop tools that would diagnose the part of disabled people’s biological reality seen by others as deficient, defect, impaired and ‘disabled’ thus allowing for preventative measures
NBICS may develop tools that would eliminate that portion of disabled people’s biological reality seen by others as deficient, defect, impaired and ‘disabled’.
NBICS may be a target for - and an influence upon - the discourses, concepts, trends and areas of action that impact disabled persons.

Discourses:
The discourse around the term human security
The religious discourse
The politics of biodiversity
The politics of inequity
The politics of the ethics discourse.
The politics of law:
The politics of raising the acceptance level for a given technology
The politics of setting goals and priorities
The politics of language
The politics of self perception and identity (Body politics)
The politics of red herrings
The politics of interpreting International treaties
The politics of governance
The Politics of evaluation, measuring, analysis, and outcome tools

Concepts:
Self identity security
Ability security
Cultural identity/diversity
Morphological freedom and morphological judgement ADDIN REFMGR.CITE Anders Sandberg2001159 Morphological Freedom -- Why We not just Want it, but Need itGeneric159 Morphological Freedom -- Why We not just Want it, but Need itAnders Sandberg2001Not in Filehttp://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/Texts/MorphologicalFreedom.htm <> mID>33(Anders Sandberg 2001)
Freedom of choice and tyranny of choice
Duty to fix oneself
Duty to know
Parental responsibility
Societal responsibility

Trends:
Change in the concepts of health, disease and ‘disability’/’impairment’
The appearance of enhancement medicine and the acceptance of beyond species-typical functioning
Moving from curative to enhancement medicine; decrease in curative medicine and the appearance of the transhumanist/enhancement burden of disease
Moving from human rights to sentient rights
Moving from morphological freedom to morphological judgement
The appearance of the techno poor disabled and impaired
Moving from freedom of choice to tyranny of choice judgement

Areas of Action:

Nanotechnology/NBIC for development
Nanotechnology/NBIC and the UN Millennium Development Goals
Nanotechnology/NBIC and global medical and social health
Nanotechnology/NBIC and accessibility
Nanotechnology/NBIC and law
Nanotechnology/NBIC and water and sanitation
Nanotechnology/NBIC and disaster management
Nanotechnology/NBIC and weapons/war
Nanotechnology/NBIC and ethics/philosophy
Nanotechnology/NBIC and social science/anthropology
Nanotechnology/NBIC and community
Nanotechnology/NBIC and networking


All of the above discourses, concepts, trends and areas of actions impact on disabled people[1] and others.
Potential contributors to this Special Issue might consider areas from the above table or one of the following topics:
What are the potential positive and negative impacts of envisioned nanoscale science and technology products and research and development on:
disabled people,
the community around them
practitioners, consumers and researchers linked to the disability discourse
community rehabilitation and the rehabilitation field in general
inclusive education and the education of disabled people in general
employability of disabled people
citizenship of disabled people
body image of disabled people
medical and social health policies and their impact on disabled people
health care for disabled people
the elderly
disabled people in low income countries
laws related to disabled people such as the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities
the concept of personhood
concept of health and health care
the measure of disability adjusted life years and other measurements used to guide health care dollar allocation
quality of life assessment
What are the potential positive and negative impacts of the new social philosophy of transhumanism that is seen as being enabled by nanoscale science and technology products and research and development?
What impacts of potential nanoscale science and technology products and research and development onto disabled people will impact other marginalized groups?
For more information about the International Journal of Disability, Community & Rehabilitation (IJDCR) please go to http://www.ijdcr.ca/.
ADDIN REFMGR.REFLIST References

Anders Sandberg. Morphological Freedom -- Why We not just Want it, but Need it. 2001. <http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/Texts/MorphologicalFreedom.htm>
Institute of Nanotechnology (2005). Research Applications And Markets In Nanotechnology In Europe 2005 <http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reportinfo.asp?report_id=302091&t=t&cat_id=4>
Kostoff, Ronald et al. "The seminal literature of nanotechnology research." Journal of Nanoparticle Research (2006): 1-21. <http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1007/s11051-005-9034-9>
M.Roco, W. Bainbridge eds. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. 2003. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Hardbound. <http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/Report/NBIC_report.pdf>
Wolbring, G. "SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE TRIPLE D (DISEASE, DISABILITY, DEFECT)." Ed. William Sims Bainbridge Mihail C.Roco National. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2003. 232-43<http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/> <http://www.bioethicsanddisability.org/nbic.html>
Wolbring, G (2005). HTA Initiative #23 The triangle of enhancement medicine, disabled people, and the concept of health: a new challenge for HTA, health research, and health policy Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Health Technology Assessment Unit, Edmonton, Alberta Canada <http://www.ihe.ca/documents/hta/HTA-FR23.pdf>
Wolbring, G (2006). Scoping paper on Nanotechnology and disabled people. Center for Nanotechnology in Society Arizona State University [On-line]. <http://cns.asu.edu/cns-library/documents/wolbring-scoping%20CD%20final%20edit.doc>

[1] The term ‘disabled people’, as used here, reflects the way in which environmental factors impact on the ability of individuals with sensory, motor, cognitive or other variations to participate in society, consistent with its usage by Disabled Peoples’ International.